-->
No one knows Rosser Reeves anymore, but our work would be better if we did. |
Long ago and far away I had set out and moved pretty far down the path
of becoming a scholar in English literature. My epigram around my ivied English
department was I was on my way to becoming a “distinguished” professor.
As the Yiddish proverb goes, “Mann
Tracht, Un Gott Lacht.” Man plans and god laughs. Back in early 80s New York,
god (and my landlord) laughed. My money ran out. So I left grad school and pursued a more
remunerative career path. I gave up the hallowed halls of Academe for the
teeming fleshpots of Madison Avenue.
Man, I could use a good fleshpot.
Man, I could use a good fleshpot.
I'm so old, when I was in college "The First Folio" was just called "The Folio". |
Anyway, I remember back to
1979 and studying Macbeth—a play I had first read some years earlier as a 10th
grader.
ACT I SCENE I A desert place.
[Thunder and lightning. Enter three Witches]
First Witch: When shall we three meet again
In thunder, lightning, or in rain?
Second Witch: When the hurlyburly's done,
When the battle's lost and won.
Hover through the fog and filthy air.
x
Hover through the fog and filthy air.
x
Third Witch: That will be ere the set of sun.
First Witch: Where the place?
Second Witch: Upon the heath.
Third Witch: There to meet with Macbeth.
First Witch: I come, graymalkin!
Second Witch: Paddock calls.:
Third Witch: Anon!
ALL: Fair is foul, and foul is fair:
[Exeunt]
In Shakespeare’s England, and today, there is a basic human need for
order in the universe. In fact, when the universe gets out of order, bad shit happens. Picture driving the wrong way down a one-way street. That kind of disorder.
Theater-goers knew that in Shakespeare’s England.
So when “When the battle's lost and won…” things are mis-aligned.
Because a battle can’t be both lost and won. More pointedly, “Fair is foul, and foul is fair:” means, in the parlance of our
era, things are all fucked up.
Let’s bring those words, Fair is foul, and foul is fair: forward to our industry.
Let’s take a look at all the things we do that people (our readers and
viewers) hate. But though people hate them, we do them because “they’re good for
business.”
Minutes ago I read an article that said 87% of participants in a survey said they would “opt out of having their personal information sold to third parties.” Naturally, to the people making money stealing your privacy, that
survey doesn’t matter. They choose to ignore the reality that people want to be
left-alone.
Adweek, the nearly irrelevant trade journal reported that “Bob Perkins, COO of BritePool, said, ‘We saw the number of people that said ‘do not sell my personal information’ decline by 30%, so when you give people two options [between ‘selling’ and ‘rewarding’] we see this big reduction.’”
Adweek, the nearly irrelevant trade journal reported that “Bob Perkins, COO of BritePool, said, ‘We saw the number of people that said ‘do not sell my personal information’ decline by 30%, so when you give people two options [between ‘selling’ and ‘rewarding’] we see this big reduction.’”
Sure, Bob. I love when people (like you and Google and Facebook, etc) get
rich off my personal data. Thank you for tracking my every click and eyeball movement.
You know what else I like, according to the advertising industry? I like
seeing 20 or so minutes of commercials every hour—even though I have to now pay an
exorbitant fee to watch TV. (My generation, which has most of the money in this
country, remembers when you paid for TV by watching about 12 minutes of
commercials per hour.)
I also like TV commercials that shout at me. With their volume turned up. And commercials that
promise me a price for a product or service that is so full of caveats literally
hundreds of words of legal copy fill the screen at a size I can’t read and a
pace that’s too fast for the speediest speed-reader.
And I like political ads that smear and sully by way of innuendo and
half truths. I especially like ads that look like they were produced by
amateurs for about what it cost to buy a balsa wood airplane, two comic books
and some Bazooka chewing gum in 1967. Yep. I like things that look like shit…who
doesn’t?
Way back in the Pleistocene
Era, some guy you might have heard of, David Ogilvy said, “The consumer is not
a moron. She is your wife.” Let’s look past the gendered aspect of that. The
consumer is not a moron.
Yet in virtually
everything we do as an industry, we treat our viewers as EAOs. Eminently Abusable Objects. We inundate them. We insult them.
We steal from them. We hit them over the head with our blather. We shout at
them. We might say,
The consumer is not a moron but treat them like they are anyway.
The consumer is not a moron but treat them like they are anyway.
Not only do we
expect them to like us for such treatment. We convince ourselves that they do.
BTW. I don’t go to
awards shows, symposia, conferences, trade shows or virtually any other place
where people in our industry gather. But I’d propose this to every industry
leader who’s actually read this far. I bet it would improve the health of the
brands we ostensibly work for.
As an Agency, a
Holding Company, an Industry or a Client, let’s introduce “Advertising’s Golden
Rule.”
It’s pretty
simple.
Before we make
something, let’s ask ourselves: “Would I like to be talked to like that?”
Is our advertising
treating people as we like to be treated?
The reality is, people hate 99% of what we make and how we follow them around and profit from our near constant surveillance.
The reality is, we should be kinder, more respectful, give more space and just leave the people alone now and again.
But where's the Mammon in that?
The reality is, we should be kinder, more respectful, give more space and just leave the people alone now and again.
But where's the Mammon in that?
Loving money more than our soul. |
No comments:
Post a Comment