The
toughest thing for me about the world today, not just the advertising world,
but the whole world, is that a set of liars or prevaricators or, charitably,
double-talkers, are inventing new words or terms faster than I can learn them.
So I
sit in meetings or listen to people on the news and I always find myself a
sentence or two behind. Mostly because I’m trying to decipher what whoever was
talking just said.
“We
have to make our advertising through the line,” someone spouted to me recently.
“What
does through the line mean?” I asked.
“360.”
“Well
then, don’t we need a single strategic brief.”
“No, it’s
through the line, not end to end.”
If I
were a cartoon character, my head would have spun off my neck and rattled
around the conference room we were sequestered in.
Worst
of all, are media discussions.
If you
understand what’s really going on in digital media, you know that a good
portion of ads never appear and even more ads are ad-blocked. All you need to
do is spend half an hour with Bob Hoffman over at adcontrarian.blogspot.com to
get a sense of the broad-dysfunction in the media world.
However,
when media tongues start flapping, you hear nothing about these issues. All you
get is a buzzword buzzsaw about dynamic banners, programmatic advertising and
so on and so on.
I try
to come back to what should be the point: no one is actually seeing our ads,
and no great communication has ever been constructed that works in an ad space
that’s approximately the size of half an index card.
But
those aren’t the things we hear.
I’ll
tell you the truth.
I don’t
know what these words mean.
I don’t
think I’ve ever even seen a programmatic ad. Or an end to end, through the line
360 communication, or a dynamic banner. I've certainly never responded to one.
Maybe I
am just dumb.
And I certainly don’t
get the lingo.
So call me
cynical.
I think
there are a lot of people who are just bull-shitting.
It's time to call them out.
It's time to call them out.
No comments:
Post a Comment