Over the past week in the sad country that used to be amerika, a convicted felon and a presidential candidate of one of the major parties boasted about the sizes of the crowds he was attracting.
About a decade ago, I noticed that when new movies were talked about in the news, they almost always mentioned their box-office boom or bust. Same with pop-music concert tours.
Not too long ago, an IPG agency that, for all intents and purposes, is out of business--or at least no longer a credible leading agency, publicly patted itself on the back because of their award-winning logo-redesign.
And just about every four seconds in amerika, some agency, or some other failing business somewhere praises themselves for being
"best agency,"
"network of the year,"
"best place to work,"
"best woman-led agency,"
"best craft agency,"
"best agency where the doors open in, not out."
In fact, nearly every hotel, airline, telco or ISP has won one major award or another, and advertise that victory as a way of telling the world how great they are.
It seems to me that so many of our judgment criteria are measuring and winning awards for things that matter not a whit.
I want a president to do all sorts of things that I regard as positive. Attracting large crowds never enter my calculus. Same for the movies I like. My guess is most of them have grossed little more than a well-placed lemonade stand on a hot summer's day. As for everything else, from telcos to airlines to ad agencies, I could give a rat's ass about the awards you say you've won and how happy your people are.
The product I get sucks. The service is worse. And your people seem to be teetering on the brink of self-immolation.
I'd guess if you looked at world history in the same manner, you could find yourself reading, "Hitler's award-winning "Einsatzgruppen." I'll give them this: great uniforms and that skull and crossbones and the piping and braiding on the rims of the peaked hat? Sartorially splendid.
That give me my money's worth.
No comments:
Post a Comment